/[MITgcm]/MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_forward.tex
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_forward.tex

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph | View Patch Patch

revision 1.1 by dimitri, Tue Feb 26 19:27:26 2008 UTC revision 1.4 by mlosch, Thu Feb 28 18:43:27 2008 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  \section{Forward sensitivity experiments}  \section{Forward sensitivity experiments}
2  \label{sec:forward}  \label{sec:forward}
3    
4    This section presents results from global and regional coupled ocean and sea
5    ice simulations that exercise various capabilities of the MITgcm sea ice
6    model.  The first set of results is from a global, eddy-permitting, ocean and
7    sea ice configuration.  The second set of results is from a regional Arctic
8    configuration, which is used to compare the B-grid and C-grid dynamic solvers
9    and various other capabilities of the MITgcm sea ice model.  The third set of
10    results is from a yet smaller regional domain, which is used to illustrate
11    treatment of sea ice open boundary condition sin the MITgcm.
12    
13    \subsection{Global Ocean and Sea Ice Simulation}
14    \label{sec:global}
15    
16    The global ocean and sea ice results presented below were carried out as part
17    of the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean, Phase II (ECCO2)
18    project.  ECCO2 aims to produce increasingly accurate syntheses of all
19    available global-scale ocean and sea-ice data at resolutions that start to
20    resolve ocean eddies and other narrow current systems, which transport heat,
21    carbon, and other properties within the ocean \citep{menemenlis05}.  The
22    particular ECCO2 simulation discussed next is a baseline 28-year (1979-2006)
23    integration, labeled cube76, which has not yet been constrained by oceanic and
24    by sea ice data.  A cube-sphere grid projection is employed, which permits
25    relatively even grid spacing throughout the domain and which avoids polar
26    singularities \citep{adcroft04:_cubed_sphere}. Each face of the cube comprises
27    510 by 510 grid cells for a mean horizontal grid spacing of 18 km. There are
28    50 vertical levels ranging in thickness from 10 m near the surface to
29    approximately 450 m at a maximum model depth of 6150 m. Bathymetry is from the
30    National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) 2-minute gridded global relief data
31    (ETOPO2) and the model employs the partial-cell formulation of
32    \citet{adcroft97:_shaved_cells}, which permits accurate representation of the
33    bathymetry. The model is integrated in a volume-conserving configuration using
34    a finite volume discretization with C-grid staggering of the prognostic
35    variables. In the ocean, the non-linear equation of state of \citet{jac95} is
36    used.
37    
38    The ocean model is coupled to the sea-ice model discussed in
39    Section~\ref{sec:model} with the following specific options.  The
40    zero-heat-capacity thermodynamics formulation of \citet{hib80} is used to
41    compute sea ice thickness and concentration.  Snow cover and sea ice salinity
42    are prognostic.  Open water, dry ice, wet ice, dry snow, and wet snow albedo
43    are, respectively, 0.15, 0.88, 0.79, 0.97, and 0.83. Ice mechanics follow the
44    viscous plastic rheology of \citet{hibler79} and the ice momentum equation is
45    solved numerically using the C-grid implementation of the \citet{zhang97} LSR
46    dynamics model discussed hereinabove.
47    
48    This particular ECCO2 simulation is initialized from temperature and salinity
49    fields derived from the
50    
51    
52    
53    \subsection{Arctic Domain with Open Boundaries}
54    \label{sec:arctic}
55    
56  A second series of forward sensitivity experiments have been carried out on an  A second series of forward sensitivity experiments have been carried out on an
57  Arctic Ocean domain with open boundaries.  Once again the objective is to  Arctic Ocean domain with open boundaries.  Once again the objective is to
58  compare the old B-grid LSR dynamic solver with the new C-grid LSR and EVP  compare the old B-grid LSR dynamic solver with the new C-grid LSR and EVP
59  solvers.  One additional experiment is carried out to illustrate the  solvers.  One additional experiment is carried out to illustrate the
60  differences between the two main options for sea ice thermodynamics in the MITgcm.  differences between the two main options for sea ice thermodynamics in the MITgcm.
61    
 \subsection{Arctic Domain with Open Boundaries}  
 \label{sec:arctic}  
   
62  The Arctic domain of integration is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:arctic1}.  It  The Arctic domain of integration is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:arctic1}.  It
63  is carved out from, and obtains open boundary conditions from, the  is carved out from, and obtains open boundary conditions from, the
64  global cubed-sphere configuration of the Estimating the Circulation  global cubed-sphere configuration of the Estimating the Circulation

Legend:
Removed from v.1.1  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.4

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22