1 |
afe |
1.16 |
% $Header: /u/u3/gcmpack/manual/part6/exch2.tex,v 1.15 2004/03/18 14:56:25 afe Exp $ |
2 |
afe |
1.1 |
% $Name: $ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
%% * Introduction |
5 |
|
|
%% o what it does, citations (refs go into mitgcm_manual.bib, |
6 |
|
|
%% preferably in alphabetic order) |
7 |
|
|
%% o Equations |
8 |
|
|
%% * Key subroutines and parameters |
9 |
|
|
%% * Reference material (auto generated from Protex and structured comments) |
10 |
|
|
%% o automatically inserted at \section{Reference} |
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
afe |
1.10 |
\section{exch2: Extended Cubed Sphere \mbox{Topology}} |
14 |
afe |
1.3 |
\label{sec:exch2} |
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
afe |
1.1 |
|
17 |
|
|
\subsection{Introduction} |
18 |
afe |
1.2 |
|
19 |
afe |
1.12 |
The \texttt{exch2} package extends the original cubed |
20 |
|
|
sphere topology configuration to allow more flexible domain |
21 |
afe |
1.9 |
decomposition and parallelization. Cube faces (also called |
22 |
|
|
subdomains) may be divided into any number of tiles that divide evenly |
23 |
|
|
into the grid point dimensions of the subdomain. Furthermore, the |
24 |
afe |
1.13 |
individual tiles can run on separate processors in different |
25 |
afe |
1.9 |
combinations, and whether exchanges between particular tiles occur |
26 |
|
|
between different processors is determined at runtime. This |
27 |
afe |
1.10 |
flexibility provides for manual compile-time load balancing across a |
28 |
|
|
relatively arbitrary number of processors. \\ |
29 |
edhill |
1.8 |
|
30 |
|
|
The exchange parameters are declared in |
31 |
|
|
\filelink{pkg/exch2/W2\_EXCH2\_TOPOLOGY.h}{pkg-exch2-W2_EXCH2_TOPOLOGY.h} |
32 |
|
|
and assigned in |
33 |
afe |
1.9 |
\filelink{pkg/exch2/w2\_e2setup.F}{pkg-exch2-w2_e2setup.F}. The |
34 |
afe |
1.11 |
validity of the cube topology depends on the \file{SIZE.h} file as |
35 |
afe |
1.12 |
detailed below. The default files provided in the release configure a |
36 |
|
|
cubed sphere topology of six tiles, one per subdomain, each with |
37 |
|
|
32$\times$32 grid points, all running on a single processor. Both |
38 |
|
|
files are generated by Matlab scripts in |
39 |
afe |
1.11 |
\file{utils/exch2/matlab-topology-generator}; see Section |
40 |
|
|
\ref{sec:topogen} \sectiontitle{Generating Topology Files for exch2} |
41 |
afe |
1.12 |
for details on creating alternate topologies. Pregenerated examples |
42 |
|
|
of these files with alternate topologies are provided under |
43 |
afe |
1.11 |
\file{utils/exch2/code-mods} along with the appropriate \file{SIZE.h} |
44 |
|
|
file for single-processor execution. |
45 |
afe |
1.9 |
|
46 |
|
|
\subsection{Invoking exch2} |
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
afe |
1.10 |
To use exch2 with the cubed sphere, the following conditions must be |
49 |
|
|
met: \\ |
50 |
afe |
1.9 |
|
51 |
afe |
1.11 |
$\bullet$ The exch2 package is included when \file{genmake2} is run. |
52 |
|
|
The easiest way to do this is to add the line \code{exch2} to the |
53 |
|
|
\file{profile.conf} file -- see Section |
54 |
afe |
1.12 |
\ref{sect:buildingCode} \sectiontitle{Building the code} for general |
55 |
afe |
1.11 |
details. \\ |
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
$\bullet$ An example of \file{W2\_EXCH2\_TOPOLOGY.h} and |
58 |
|
|
\file{w2\_e2setup.F} must reside in a directory containing code |
59 |
|
|
linked when \file{genmake2} runs. The safest place to put these |
60 |
|
|
is the directory indicated in the \code{-mods=DIR} command line |
61 |
|
|
modifier (typically \file{../code}), or the build directory. The |
62 |
|
|
default versions of these files reside in \file{pkg/exch2} and are |
63 |
afe |
1.10 |
linked automatically if no other versions exist elsewhere in the |
64 |
|
|
link path, but they should be left untouched to avoid breaking |
65 |
|
|
configurations other than the one you intend to modify.\\ |
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
$\bullet$ Files containing grid parameters, named |
68 |
afe |
1.13 |
\file{tile00$n$.mitgrid} where $n$=\code{(1:6)} (one per subdomain), |
69 |
|
|
must be in the working directory when the MITgcm executable is run. |
70 |
afe |
1.12 |
These files are provided in the example experiments for cubed sphere |
71 |
|
|
configurations with 32$\times$32 cube sides and are non-trivial to |
72 |
|
|
generate -- please contact MITgcm support if you want to generate |
73 |
|
|
files for other configurations. \\ |
74 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
$\bullet$ As always when compiling MITgcm, the file \file{SIZE.h} must |
76 |
afe |
1.13 |
be placed where \file{genmake2} will find it. In particular for |
77 |
afe |
1.12 |
exch2, the domain decomposition specified in \file{SIZE.h} must |
78 |
|
|
correspond with the particular configuration's topology specified in |
79 |
|
|
\file{W2\_EXCH2\_TOPOLOGY.h} and \file{w2\_e2setup.F}. Domain |
80 |
|
|
decomposition issues particular to exch2 are addressed in Section |
81 |
|
|
\ref{sec:topogen} \sectiontitle{Generating Topology Files for exch2} |
82 |
|
|
and \ref{sec:exch2mpi} \sectiontitle{exch2, SIZE.h, and MPI}; a more |
83 |
|
|
general background on the subject relevant to MITgcm is presented in |
84 |
|
|
Section \ref{sect:specifying_a_decomposition} |
85 |
|
|
\sectiontitle{Specifying a decomposition}.\\ |
86 |
afe |
1.9 |
|
87 |
|
|
As of the time of writing the following examples use exch2 and may be |
88 |
|
|
used for guidance: |
89 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
91 |
|
|
verification/adjust_nlfs.cs-32x32x1 |
92 |
|
|
verification/adjustment.cs-32x32x1 |
93 |
|
|
verification/aim.5l_cs |
94 |
|
|
verification/global_ocean.cs32x15 |
95 |
|
|
verification/hs94.cs-32x32x5 |
96 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
afe |
1.10 |
\subsection{Generating Topology Files for exch2} |
102 |
|
|
\label{sec:topogen} |
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
Alternate cubed sphere topologies may be created using the Matlab |
105 |
afe |
1.11 |
scripts in \file{utils/exch2/matlab-topology-generator}. Running the |
106 |
afe |
1.12 |
m-file |
107 |
|
|
\filelink{driver.m}{utils-exch2-matlab-topology-generator_driver.m} |
108 |
|
|
from the Matlab prompt (there are no parameters to pass) generates |
109 |
|
|
exch2 topology files \file{W2\_EXCH2\_TOPOLOGY.h} and |
110 |
|
|
\file{w2\_e2setup.F} in the working directory and displays a figure of |
111 |
|
|
the topology via Matlab. The other m-files in the directory are |
112 |
|
|
subroutines of \file{driver.m} and should not be run ``bare'' except |
113 |
|
|
for development purposes. \\ |
114 |
afe |
1.10 |
|
115 |
|
|
The parameters that determine the dimensions and topology of the |
116 |
afe |
1.11 |
generated configuration are \code{nr}, \code{nb}, \code{ng}, |
117 |
afe |
1.12 |
\code{tnx} and \code{tny}, and all are assigned early in the script. \\ |
118 |
afe |
1.10 |
|
119 |
afe |
1.12 |
The first three determine the size of the subdomains and |
120 |
afe |
1.10 |
hence the size of the overall domain. Each one determines the number |
121 |
|
|
of grid points, and therefore the resolution, along the subdomain |
122 |
afe |
1.13 |
sides in a ``great circle'' around an axis of the cube. At the time |
123 |
afe |
1.10 |
of this writing MITgcm requires these three parameters to be equal, |
124 |
afe |
1.12 |
but they provide for future releases to accomodate different |
125 |
afe |
1.10 |
resolutions around the axes to allow (for example) greater resolution |
126 |
|
|
around the equator.\\ |
127 |
|
|
|
128 |
afe |
1.11 |
The parameters \code{tnx} and \code{tny} determine the dimensions of |
129 |
|
|
the tiles into which the subdomains are decomposed, and must evenly |
130 |
|
|
divide the integer assigned to \code{nr}, \code{nb} and \code{ng}. |
131 |
|
|
The result is a rectangular tiling of the subdomain. Figure |
132 |
afe |
1.13 |
\ref{fig:24tile} shows one possible topology for a twentyfour-tile |
133 |
afe |
1.11 |
cube, and figure \ref{fig:12tile} shows one for twelve tiles. \\ |
134 |
afe |
1.10 |
|
135 |
|
|
\begin{figure} |
136 |
|
|
\begin{center} |
137 |
|
|
\resizebox{4in}{!}{ |
138 |
|
|
\includegraphics{part6/s24t_16x16.ps} |
139 |
|
|
} |
140 |
|
|
\end{center} |
141 |
afe |
1.12 |
|
142 |
afe |
1.13 |
\caption{Plot of a cubed sphere topology with a 32$\times$192 domain |
143 |
afe |
1.12 |
divided into six 32$\times$32 subdomains, each of which is divided into four tiles |
144 |
afe |
1.13 |
(\code{tnx=16, tny=16}) for a total of twentyfour tiles. |
145 |
afe |
1.10 |
} \label{fig:24tile} |
146 |
|
|
\end{figure} |
147 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
\begin{figure} |
149 |
|
|
\begin{center} |
150 |
|
|
\resizebox{4in}{!}{ |
151 |
|
|
\includegraphics{part6/s12t_16x32.ps} |
152 |
|
|
} |
153 |
|
|
\end{center} |
154 |
afe |
1.13 |
\caption{Plot of a cubed sphere topology with a 32$\times$192 domain |
155 |
afe |
1.12 |
divided into six 32$\times$32 subdomains of two tiles each |
156 |
|
|
(\code{tnx=16, tny=32}). |
157 |
afe |
1.10 |
} \label{fig:12tile} |
158 |
|
|
\end{figure} |
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
afe |
1.13 |
\begin{figure} |
161 |
|
|
\begin{center} |
162 |
|
|
\resizebox{4in}{!}{ |
163 |
|
|
\includegraphics{part6/s6t_32x32.ps} |
164 |
|
|
} |
165 |
|
|
\end{center} |
166 |
|
|
\caption{Plot of a cubed sphere topology with a 32$\times$192 domain |
167 |
|
|
divided into six 32$\times$32 subdomains with one tile each |
168 |
|
|
(\code{tnx=32, tny=32}). This is the default configuration. |
169 |
|
|
} |
170 |
|
|
\label{fig:6tile} |
171 |
|
|
\end{figure} |
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
174 |
afe |
1.10 |
Tiles can be selected from the topology to be omitted from being |
175 |
afe |
1.12 |
allocated memory and processors. This tuning is useful in ocean |
176 |
|
|
modeling for omitting tiles that fall entirely on land. The tiles |
177 |
|
|
omitted are specified in the file |
178 |
|
|
\filelink{blanklist.txt}{utils-exch2-matlab-topology-generator_blanklist.txt} |
179 |
|
|
by their tile number in the topology, separated by a newline. \\ |
180 |
|
|
|
181 |
afe |
1.10 |
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
184 |
afe |
1.12 |
\subsection{exch2, SIZE.h, and multiprocessing} |
185 |
|
|
\label{sec:exch2mpi} |
186 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
Once the topology configuration files are created, the Fortran |
188 |
afe |
1.13 |
\code{PARAMETER}s in \file{SIZE.h} must be configured to match. |
189 |
|
|
Section \ref{sect:specifying_a_decomposition} \sectiontitle{Specifying |
190 |
|
|
a decomposition} provides a general description of domain |
191 |
|
|
decomposition within MITgcm and its relation to \file{SIZE.h}. The |
192 |
|
|
current section specifies certain constraints the exch2 package |
193 |
|
|
imposes as well as describes how to enable parallel execution with |
194 |
|
|
MPI. \\ |
195 |
afe |
1.12 |
|
196 |
|
|
As in the general case, the parameters \varlink{sNx}{sNx} and |
197 |
|
|
\varlink{sNy}{sNy} define the size of the individual tiles, and so |
198 |
|
|
must be assigned the same respective values as \code{tnx} and |
199 |
|
|
\code{tny} in \file{driver.m}.\\ |
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
The halo width parameters \varlink{OLx}{OLx} and \varlink{OLy}{OLy} |
202 |
|
|
have no special bearing on exch2 and may be assigned as in the general |
203 |
|
|
case. The same holds for \varlink{Nr}{Nr}, the number of vertical |
204 |
|
|
levels in the model.\\ |
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
The parameters \varlink{nSx}{nSx}, \varlink{nSy}{nSy}, |
207 |
|
|
\varlink{nPx}{nPx}, and \varlink{nPy}{nPy} relate to the number of |
208 |
|
|
tiles and how they are distributed on processors. When using exch2, |
209 |
|
|
the tiles are stored in single dimension, and so |
210 |
|
|
\code{\varlink{nSy}{nSy}=1} in all cases. Since the tiles as |
211 |
|
|
configured by exch2 cannot be split up accross processors without |
212 |
|
|
regenerating the topology, \code{\varlink{nPy}{nPy}=1} as well. \\ |
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
The number of tiles MITgcm allocates and how they are distributed |
215 |
|
|
between processors depends on \varlink{nPx}{nPx} and |
216 |
|
|
\varlink{nSx}{nSx}. \varlink{nSx}{nSx} is the number of tiles per |
217 |
|
|
processor and \varlink{nPx}{nPx} the number of processors. The total |
218 |
|
|
number of tiles in the topology minus those listed in |
219 |
|
|
\file{blanklist.txt} must equal \code{nSx*nPx}. \\ |
220 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
The following is an example of \file{SIZE.h} for the twelve-tile |
222 |
|
|
configuration illustrated in figure \ref{fig:12tile} running on |
223 |
|
|
one processor: \\ |
224 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
226 |
|
|
PARAMETER ( |
227 |
|
|
& sNx = 16, |
228 |
|
|
& sNy = 32, |
229 |
|
|
& OLx = 2, |
230 |
|
|
& OLy = 2, |
231 |
|
|
& nSx = 12, |
232 |
|
|
& nSy = 1, |
233 |
|
|
& nPx = 1, |
234 |
|
|
& nPy = 1, |
235 |
|
|
& Nx = sNx*nSx*nPx, |
236 |
|
|
& Ny = sNy*nSy*nPy, |
237 |
|
|
& Nr = 5) |
238 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
239 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
The following is an example for the twentyfour-tile topology in figure |
241 |
|
|
\ref{fig:24tile} running on six processors: |
242 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
244 |
|
|
PARAMETER ( |
245 |
|
|
& sNx = 16, |
246 |
|
|
& sNy = 16, |
247 |
|
|
& OLx = 2, |
248 |
|
|
& OLy = 2, |
249 |
|
|
& nSx = 4, |
250 |
|
|
& nSy = 1, |
251 |
|
|
& nPx = 6, |
252 |
|
|
& nPy = 1, |
253 |
|
|
& Nx = sNx*nSx*nPx, |
254 |
|
|
& Ny = sNy*nSy*nPy, |
255 |
|
|
& Nr = 5) |
256 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
257 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
259 |
afe |
1.10 |
|
260 |
|
|
|
261 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
262 |
|
|
\subsection{Key Variables} |
263 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
The descriptions of the variables are divided up into scalars, |
265 |
edhill |
1.8 |
one-dimensional arrays indexed to the tile number, and two and three |
266 |
|
|
dimensional arrays indexed to tile number and neighboring tile. This |
267 |
afe |
1.12 |
division reflects the functionality of these variables: The |
268 |
edhill |
1.8 |
scalars are common to every part of the topology, the tile-indexed |
269 |
afe |
1.12 |
arrays to individual tiles, and the arrays indexed by tile and |
270 |
|
|
neighbor to relationships between tiles and their neighbors. \\ |
271 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
272 |
|
|
\subsubsection{Scalars} |
273 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
The number of tiles in a particular topology is set with the parameter |
275 |
afe |
1.12 |
\code{NTILES}, and the maximum number of neighbors of any tiles by |
276 |
|
|
\code{MAX\_NEIGHBOURS}. These parameters are used for defining the |
277 |
edhill |
1.8 |
size of the various one and two dimensional arrays that store tile |
278 |
afe |
1.12 |
parameters indexed to the tile number and are assigned in the files |
279 |
|
|
generated by \file{driver.m}.\\ |
280 |
edhill |
1.8 |
|
281 |
|
|
The scalar parameters \varlink{exch2\_domain\_nxt}{exch2_domain_nxt} |
282 |
|
|
and \varlink{exch2\_domain\_nyt}{exch2_domain_nyt} express the number |
283 |
afe |
1.12 |
of tiles in the $x$ and $y$ global indices. For example, the default |
284 |
afe |
1.15 |
setup of six tiles (Fig. \ref{fig:6tile}) has |
285 |
|
|
\code{exch2\_domain\_nxt=6} and \code{exch2\_domain\_nyt=1}. A |
286 |
|
|
topology of twenty-four square tiles, four per subdomain (as in figure |
287 |
|
|
\ref{fig:24tile}), will have \code{exch2\_domain\_nxt=12} and |
288 |
|
|
\code{exch2\_domain\_nyt=2}. Note that these parameters express the |
289 |
|
|
tile layout to allow global data files that are tile-layout-neutral |
290 |
|
|
and have no bearing on the internal storage of the arrays. The tiles |
291 |
|
|
are internally stored in a range from \code{(1:\varlink{bi}{bi})} the |
292 |
|
|
$x$ axis, and the $y$ axis variable \varlink{bj}{bj} is generally |
293 |
|
|
ignored within the package. \\ |
294 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
295 |
afe |
1.6 |
\subsubsection{Arrays Indexed to Tile Number} |
296 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
297 |
afe |
1.15 |
The following arrays are of length \code{NTILES}and are indexed to the |
298 |
|
|
tile number, which is indicated in the diagrams with the notation |
299 |
|
|
\textsf{t}$n$. The indices are omitted in the descriptions. \\ |
300 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
301 |
edhill |
1.8 |
The arrays \varlink{exch2\_tnx}{exch2_tnx} and |
302 |
afe |
1.12 |
\varlink{exch2\_tny}{exch2_tny} express the $x$ and $y$ dimensions of |
303 |
|
|
each tile. At present for each tile \texttt{exch2\_tnx=sNx} and |
304 |
|
|
\texttt{exch2\_tny=sNy}, as assigned in \file{SIZE.h} and described in |
305 |
|
|
section \ref{sec:exch2mpi} \sectiontitle{exch2, SIZE.h, and |
306 |
|
|
multiprocessing}. Future releases of MITgcm are to allow varying tile |
307 |
|
|
sizes. \\ |
308 |
edhill |
1.8 |
|
309 |
|
|
The location of the tiles' Cartesian origin within a subdomain are |
310 |
|
|
determined by the arrays \varlink{exch2\_tbasex}{exch2_tbasex} and |
311 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_tbasey}{exch2_tbasey}. These variables are used to |
312 |
afe |
1.12 |
relate the location of the edges of different tiles to each other. As |
313 |
afe |
1.13 |
an example, in the default six-tile topology (Fig. \ref{fig:6tile}) |
314 |
|
|
each index in these arrays is set to \code{0} since a tile occupies |
315 |
|
|
its entire subdomain. The twentyfour-tile case discussed above will |
316 |
|
|
have values of \code{0} or \code{16}, depending on the quadrant the |
317 |
|
|
tile falls within the subdomain. The elements of the arrays |
318 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_txglobalo}{exch2_txglobalo} and |
319 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_txglobalo}{exch2_txglobalo} are similar to |
320 |
edhill |
1.8 |
\varlink{exch2\_tbasex}{exch2_tbasex} and |
321 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_tbasey}{exch2_tbasey}, but locate the tiles within the |
322 |
afe |
1.12 |
global address space, similar to that used by global files. \\ |
323 |
edhill |
1.8 |
|
324 |
afe |
1.13 |
The array \varlink{exch2\_myFace}{exch2_myFace} contains the number of |
325 |
|
|
the subdomain of each tile, in a range \code{(1:6)} in the case of the |
326 |
|
|
standard cube topology and indicated by \textbf{\textsf{f}}$n$ in |
327 |
|
|
figures \ref{fig:12tile} and |
328 |
|
|
\ref{fig:24tile}. \varlink{exch2\_nNeighbours}{exch2_nNeighbours} |
329 |
afe |
1.15 |
contains a count the neighboring tiles each tile has, and is |
330 |
afe |
1.13 |
used for setting bounds for looping over neighboring tiles. |
331 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_tProc}{exch2_tProc} holds the process rank of each |
332 |
|
|
tile, and is used in interprocess communication. \\ |
333 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
335 |
edhill |
1.8 |
The arrays \varlink{exch2\_isWedge}{exch2_isWedge}, |
336 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_isEedge}{exch2_isEedge}, |
337 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_isSedge}{exch2_isSedge}, and |
338 |
afe |
1.12 |
\varlink{exch2\_isNedge}{exch2_isNedge} are set to \code{1} if the |
339 |
afe |
1.15 |
indexed tile lies on the respective edge of a subdomain, \code{0} if |
340 |
|
|
not. The values are used within the topology generator to determine |
341 |
|
|
the orientation of neighboring tiles, and to indicate whether a tile |
342 |
|
|
lies on the corner of a subdomain. The latter case requires special |
343 |
afe |
1.12 |
exchange and numerical handling for the singularities at the eight |
344 |
afe |
1.13 |
corners of the cube. \\ |
345 |
|
|
|
346 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
347 |
afe |
1.6 |
\subsubsection{Arrays Indexed to Tile Number and Neighbor} |
348 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
349 |
afe |
1.12 |
The following arrays are all of size |
350 |
|
|
\code{MAX\_NEIGHBOURS}$\times$\code{NTILES} and describe the |
351 |
|
|
orientations between the the tiles. \\ |
352 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
The array \code{exch2\_neighbourId(a,T)} holds the tile number |
354 |
|
|
\code{Tn} for each of the tile number \code{T}'s neighboring tiles |
355 |
afe |
1.15 |
\code{a}. The neighbor tiles are indexed |
356 |
|
|
\code{(1:exch2\_NNeighbours(T))} in the order right to left on the |
357 |
|
|
north then south edges, and then top to bottom on the east and west |
358 |
|
|
edges. Maybe throw in a fig here, eh? \\ |
359 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
\sloppy The \code{exch2\_opposingSend\_record(a,T)} array holds the |
361 |
|
|
index \code{b} of the element in \texttt{exch2\_neighbourId(b,Tn)} |
362 |
|
|
that holds the tile number \code{T}, given |
363 |
|
|
\code{Tn=exch2\_neighborId(a,T)}. In other words, |
364 |
edhill |
1.8 |
\begin{verbatim} |
365 |
|
|
exch2_neighbourId( exch2_opposingSend_record(a,T), |
366 |
|
|
exch2_neighbourId(a,T) ) = T |
367 |
afe |
1.5 |
\end{verbatim} |
368 |
afe |
1.12 |
This provides a back-reference from the neighbor tiles. \\ |
369 |
afe |
1.5 |
|
370 |
afe |
1.13 |
The arrays \varlink{exch2\_pi}{exch2_pi} and |
371 |
afe |
1.15 |
\varlink{exch2\_pj}{exch2_pj} specify the transformations of indices |
372 |
afe |
1.13 |
in exchanges between the neighboring tiles. These transformations are |
373 |
afe |
1.15 |
necessary in exchanges between subdomains because the array index in |
374 |
|
|
one dimension may map to the other index in an adjacent subdomain, and |
375 |
|
|
may be have its indexing reversed. This swapping arises from the |
376 |
|
|
``folding'' of two-dimensional arrays into a three-dimensional cube. |
377 |
afe |
1.13 |
|
378 |
|
|
The dimensions of \code{exch2\_pi(t,N,T)} and \code{exch2\_pj(t,N,T)} |
379 |
|
|
are the neighbor ID \code{N} and the tile number \code{T} as explained |
380 |
afe |
1.15 |
above, plus a vector of length \code{2} containing transformation |
381 |
|
|
factors \code{t}. The first element of the transformation vector |
382 |
|
|
holds the factor to multiply the index in the same axis, and the |
383 |
|
|
second element holds the the same for the orthogonal index. To |
384 |
|
|
clarify, \code{exch2\_pi(1,N,T)} holds the mapping of the $x$ axis |
385 |
|
|
index of tile \code{T} to the $x$ axis of tile \code{T}'s neighbor |
386 |
|
|
\code{N}, and \code{exch2\_pi(2,N,T)} holds the mapping of \code{T}'s |
387 |
|
|
$x$ index to the neighbor \code{N}'s $y$ index. \\ |
388 |
afe |
1.12 |
|
389 |
afe |
1.15 |
One of the two elements of \code{exch2\_pi} or \code{exch2\_pj} for a |
390 |
|
|
given tile \code{T} and neighbor \code{N} will be \code{0}, reflecting |
391 |
|
|
the fact that the two axes are orthogonal. The other element will be |
392 |
|
|
\code{1} or \code{-1}, depending on whether the axes are indexed in |
393 |
|
|
the same or opposite directions. For example, the transform vector of |
394 |
|
|
the arrays for all tile neighbors on the same subdomain will be |
395 |
afe |
1.13 |
\code{(1,0)}, since all tiles on the same subdomain are oriented |
396 |
afe |
1.15 |
identically. An axis that corresponds to the orthogonal dimension |
397 |
|
|
with the same index direction in a particular tile-neighbor |
398 |
|
|
orientation will have \code{(0,1)}. Those in the opposite index |
399 |
|
|
direction will have \code{(0,-1)} in order to reverse the ordering. \\ |
400 |
afe |
1.13 |
|
401 |
afe |
1.14 |
The arrays \varlink{exch2\_oi}{exch2_oi}, |
402 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_oj}{exch2_oj}, \varlink{exch2\_oi\_f}{exch2_oi_f}, and |
403 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_oj\_f}{exch2_oj_f} are indexed to tile number and |
404 |
|
|
neighbor and specify the relative offset within the subdomain of the |
405 |
|
|
array index of a variable going from a neighboring tile $N$ to a local |
406 |
afe |
1.16 |
tile $T$. Consider \code{T=1} in the six-tile topology |
407 |
|
|
(Fig. \ref{fig:6tile}), where |
408 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
410 |
|
|
exch2_oi(1,1)=33 |
411 |
|
|
exch2_oi(2,1)=0 |
412 |
|
|
exch2_oi(3,1)=32 |
413 |
|
|
exch2_oi(4,1)=-32 |
414 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
415 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
The simplest case is \code{exch2\_oi(2,1)}, the southern neighbor, |
417 |
|
|
which is \code{Tn=6}. The axes of \code{T} and \code{Tn} have the |
418 |
|
|
same orientation and their $x$ axes have the same origin, and so an |
419 |
|
|
exchange between the two requires no changes to the $x$ index. For |
420 |
|
|
the western neighbor (\code{Tn=5}), \code{code\_oi(3,1)=32} since the |
421 |
|
|
\code{x=0} vector on \code{T} corresponds to the \code{y=32} vector on |
422 |
|
|
\code{Tn}. The eastern edge of \code{T} shows the reverse case |
423 |
|
|
(\code{exch2\_oi(4,1)=-32)}, where \code{x=32} on \code{T} exchanges |
424 |
|
|
with \code{x=0} on \code{Tn=2}. The most interesting case, where |
425 |
|
|
\code{exch2\_oi(1,1)=33} and \code{Tn=3}, involves a reversal of |
426 |
|
|
indices. As in every case, the offset \code{exch2\_oi} is added to |
427 |
|
|
the original $x$ index of \code{T} multiplied by the transformation |
428 |
|
|
factor \code{exch2\_pi(t,N,T)}. Here \code{exch2\_pi(1,1,1)=0} since |
429 |
|
|
the $x$ axis of \code{T} is orthogonal to the $x$ axis of \code{Tn}. |
430 |
|
|
\code{exch2\_pi(2,1,1)=-1} since the $x$ axis of \code{T} corresponds |
431 |
|
|
to the $y$ axis of \code{Tn}, but the axes are reversed. The result |
432 |
|
|
is that the index of the northern edge of \code{T}, which runs |
433 |
|
|
\code{(1:32)}, is transformed to |
434 |
|
|
\code{(-1:-32)}. \code{exch2\_oi(1,1)} is then added to this range to |
435 |
|
|
get back \code{(1:32)} -- the index of the $y$ axis of \code{Tn}. |
436 |
|
|
This transformation may seem overly convoluted for the six-tile case, |
437 |
|
|
but it is necessary to provide a general solution for various |
438 |
|
|
topologies. \\ |
439 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
441 |
afe |
1.14 |
|
442 |
|
|
Finally, \varlink{exch2\_itlo\_c}{exch2_itlo_c}, |
443 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_ithi\_c}{exch2_ithi_c}, |
444 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_jtlo\_c}{exch2_jtlo_c} and |
445 |
|
|
\varlink{exch2\_jthi\_c}{exch2_jthi_c} hold the location and index |
446 |
|
|
bounds of the edge segment of the neighbor tile \code{N}'s subdomain |
447 |
|
|
that gets exchanged with the local tile \code{T}. To take the example |
448 |
|
|
of tile \code{T=2} in the twelve-tile topology |
449 |
|
|
(Fig. \ref{fig:12tile}): \\ |
450 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
452 |
|
|
exch2_itlo_c(4,2)=17 |
453 |
|
|
exch2_ithi_c(4,2)=17 |
454 |
|
|
exch2_jtlo_c(4,2)=0 |
455 |
|
|
exch2_jthi_c(4,2)=33 |
456 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
457 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
Here \code{N=4}, indicating the western neighbor, which is \code{Tn=1}. |
459 |
|
|
\code{Tn=1} resides on the same subdomain as \code{T=2}, so the tiles |
460 |
|
|
have the same orientation and the same $x$ and $y$ axes. The $i$ |
461 |
|
|
component is orthogonal to the western edge and the tile is 16 points |
462 |
|
|
wide, so \code{exch2\_itlo\_c} and \code{exch2\_ithi\_c} indicate the |
463 |
|
|
column beyond \code{Tn=1}'s eastern edge, in that tile's halo |
464 |
|
|
region. Since the border of the tiles extends through the entire |
465 |
|
|
height of the subdomain, the $y$ axis bounds \code{exch2\_jtlo\_c} to |
466 |
|
|
\code{exch2\_jthi\_c} cover the height, plus 1 in either direction to |
467 |
|
|
cover part of the halo. \\ |
468 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
For the north edge of the same tile \code{T=2} where \code{N=1} and |
470 |
|
|
the neighbor tile is \code{Tn=5}: |
471 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
473 |
|
|
exch2_itlo_c(1,2)=0 |
474 |
|
|
exch2_ithi_c(1,2)=0 |
475 |
|
|
exch2_jtlo_c(1,2)=0 |
476 |
|
|
exch2_jthi_c(1,2)=17 |
477 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
478 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
\code{T}'s northern edge is parallel to the $x$ axis, but since |
480 |
|
|
\code{Tn}'s $y$ axis corresponds to \code{T}'s $x$ axis, |
481 |
|
|
\code{T}'s northern edge exchanges with \code{Tn}'s western edge. |
482 |
|
|
The western edge of the tiles corresponds to the lower bound of the |
483 |
|
|
$x$ axis, so \code{exch2\_itlo\_c} \code{exch2\_ithi\_c} are \code{0}. The |
484 |
|
|
range of \code{exch2\_jtlo\_c} and \code{exch2\_jthi\_c} correspond to the |
485 |
|
|
width of \code{T}'s northern edge, plus the halo. \\ |
486 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
490 |
afe |
1.13 |
|
491 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
495 |
afe |
1.5 |
|
496 |
afe |
1.4 |
|
497 |
afe |
1.14 |
This needs some diagrams. \\ |
498 |
afe |
1.1 |
|
499 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
\subsection{Key Routines} |
502 |
|
|
|
503 |
afe |
1.16 |
Most of the subroutines particular to exch2 handle the exchanges |
504 |
|
|
themselves and are of the same format as those described in |
505 |
|
|
\ref{sect:cube_sphere_communication} \sectiontitle{Cube sphere |
506 |
|
|
communication}. Like the original routines, they are written as |
507 |
|
|
templates which the local Makefile converts from RX into RL and RS |
508 |
|
|
forms. \\ |
509 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
The interfaces with the core model subroutines are |
511 |
|
|
\code{EXCH\_UV\_XY\_RX}, \code{EXCH\_UV\_XYZ\_RX} and \code{EXCH\_XY\_RX}. |
512 |
|
|
They override the standard exchange routines when \code{genmake2} is |
513 |
|
|
run with \code{exch2} option. They in turn call the local exch2 |
514 |
|
|
subroutines \code{EXCH2\_UV\_XY\_RX} and \code{EXCH2\_UV\_XYZ\_RX} for two |
515 |
|
|
and three dimensional vector quantities, and \code{EXCH2\_XY\_RX} and |
516 |
|
|
\code{EXCH2\_XYZ\_RX} for two and three dimensional scalar quantities. |
517 |
|
|
These subroutines set the dimensions of the area to be exchanged, call |
518 |
|
|
\code{EXCH2\_RX1\_CUBE} for scalars and \code{EXCH2\_RX2\_CUBE} for |
519 |
|
|
vectors, and then handle the singularities at the cube corners. \\ |
520 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
The separate scalar and vector forms of \code{EXCH2\_RX1\_CUBE} and |
522 |
|
|
\code{EXCH2\_RX2\_CUBE} reflect that the vector-handling subrouine needs |
523 |
|
|
to pass both the $x$ and $y$ components of the vectors. This arises |
524 |
|
|
from the topological folding discussed above, where the $x$ and $y$ |
525 |
|
|
axes get swapped in some cases. This swapping is not an issue with |
526 |
|
|
the scalar version. These subroutines call \code{EXCH2\_SEND\_RX1} and |
527 |
|
|
\code{EXCH2\_SEND\_RX2}, which do most of the work using the variables |
528 |
|
|
discussed above. \\ |
529 |
afe |
1.1 |
|