167 |
\end{array} |
\end{array} |
168 |
\right) |
\right) |
169 |
\end{equation} |
\end{equation} |
170 |
which differs from the variable laplacian diffusion tensor by only |
which differs from the variable Laplacian diffusion tensor by only |
171 |
two non-zero elements in the $z$-row. |
two non-zero elements in the $z$-row. |
172 |
|
|
173 |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
218 |
Experience with the GFDL model showed that the GM scheme has to be |
Experience with the GFDL model showed that the GM scheme has to be |
219 |
matched to the convective parameterization. This was originally |
matched to the convective parameterization. This was originally |
220 |
expressed in connection with the introduction of the KPP boundary |
expressed in connection with the introduction of the KPP boundary |
221 |
layer scheme (Large et al., 97) but infact, as subsequent experience |
layer scheme (Large et al., 97) but in fact, as subsequent experience |
222 |
with the MIT model has found, is necessary for any convective |
with the MIT model has found, is necessary for any convective |
223 |
parameterization. |
parameterization. |
224 |
|
|
261 |
such regions can be either infinite, very large with a sign reversal |
such regions can be either infinite, very large with a sign reversal |
262 |
or simply very large. From a numerical point of view, large slopes |
or simply very large. From a numerical point of view, large slopes |
263 |
lead to large variations in the tensor elements (implying large bolus |
lead to large variations in the tensor elements (implying large bolus |
264 |
flow) and can be numerically unstable. This was first reognized by |
flow) and can be numerically unstable. This was first recognized by |
265 |
Cox, 1987, who implemented ``slope clipping'' in the isopycnal mixing |
Cox, 1987, who implemented ``slope clipping'' in the isopycnal mixing |
266 |
tensor. Here, the slope magnitude is simply restricted by an upper |
tensor. Here, the slope magnitude is simply restricted by an upper |
267 |
limit: |
limit: |
296 |
diffusion). The classic result of dramatically reduced mixed layers is |
diffusion). The classic result of dramatically reduced mixed layers is |
297 |
evident. Indeed, the deep convection sites to just one or two points |
evident. Indeed, the deep convection sites to just one or two points |
298 |
each and are much shallower than we might prefer. This, it turns out, |
each and are much shallower than we might prefer. This, it turns out, |
299 |
is due to the over zealous restratification due to the bolus transport |
is due to the over zealous re-stratification due to the bolus transport |
300 |
parameterization. Limiting the slopes also breaks the adiabatic nature |
parameterization. Limiting the slopes also breaks the adiabatic nature |
301 |
of the GM/Redi parameterization, re-introducing diabatic fluxes in |
of the GM/Redi parameterization, re-introducing diabatic fluxes in |
302 |
regions where the limiting is in effect. |
regions where the limiting is in effect. |